Needham v. State

David Newbern, Judge.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether the decision of the court in revoking the appellant’s probation was clearly against the preponderance of the evidence. The parties seem to agree upon the evidentiary standard which must be met for revocation. Their disagreement is with respect to whether the evidence before us meets that standard. We find that it does and thus we affirm.

The appellant was placed on probation on October 29, 1979, as a result of having been accused of six counts of “obtaining a controlled substance by fraud.” In each of the counts the…