Legal Opinion
Henry v. Wetzler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 22, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Crew III, J.
The essential facts have been stipulated. At all relevant times, petitioner was an officer of Chanry Communications, Ltd. which owns, publishes and distributes 17 separate free-circulation "pennysaver” newspapers throughout the Long Island region. Chanry is in the business of soliciting and receiving advertisements from various advertisers which, in turn, require that their ads appear in the pennysavers and that the pennysavers be distributed within specific geographic areas. The advertisers dictate the specific type and format of the ad placed in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- 172 East 122 Street Tenants Ass'n v. SchwarzNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Schwartz v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Scotsmen Press, Inc. v. State Tax Appeals TribunalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Dental Society v. New York State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Henry v. WetzlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Mera v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of the StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- International Bar Ass'n v. Tax Appeals TribunalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994