Legal Opinion

Marcelletti v. Hawley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1915No. Docket No. 67PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Van Burén; Des Voignes, J. Replevin by Luci Marcelletti against Fred Hawley for a horse. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is a replevin case growing out of a horse trade made upon Sunday. The plaintiff claimed to be the owner of the horse in question, and that she authorized her brother-in-law to sell it; that, instead of doing so, he traded it for a worthless animal. A replevin suit was begun in the name of the husband of the plaintiff. The property was taken by said writ from the defendant. It is the claim that this writ was sued out in the name of the husband, because of his imperfect knowledge of the English language, and after the return day, and before the adjourned day, the replevin case was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trudo v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Hickey v. HinsdaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Gildas v. CrosbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. House v. TurnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Eales v. FrancisMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bellows v. GoodfellowMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API