Driscoll v. Howard
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The action ivas brought to enforce the alleged lien of a street assessment. The action was brought against Thomas B. Howard and Mary T. B. Howard as defendants. The complaint avers “that said defendants are the owners in fee of said described land, and in possession of and claiming to own the same, and exercising acts of ownership over *440the same. That the legal title of said land appears by deeds recorded in the recorder's office of said city and county to be in defendants.” The action was dismissed by plaintiff as to defendant Mary T. B. Howard. Upon the default of the defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hancock v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Clark v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Diggins v. ReayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Harney v. AppelgateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- People of San Francisco v. DoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by1 opinion
- White v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895