Legal Opinion

Reeves and Another v. Hogan and Henderson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1812PublishedCited by 1 opinion

>- Chancery. ) This was a bill in equity brought by the complainants, to be relieved against a judgment at law obtained by Hogan, assignee of Henderson, upon a bond for two hundred dollars.

Read the full summary

>- Chancery. ) This was a bill in equity brought by the complainants, to be relieved against a judgment at law obtained by Hogan, assignee of Henderson, upon a bond for two hundred dollars. The bill states that the complainants executed their bond to the defendant Henderson for two hundred dollars ; that Henderson left this country, whereupon divers persons sued out attachments against him, and summoned the complainants as garnishees ; that in these cases they were compelled to pay as garnishees for the said Henderson seventy-six dollars, in consequence 'of which they procured a credit…

1Opinion of the Court

S. C., 1 Tenn., 513.

This was a bill in equity brought by the complainants, to be relieved against a judgment at law obtained by Hogan, assignee of Henderson, upon a bond for two hundred dollars.

The bill states that the complainants executed their bond to the defendant Henderson for two hundred dollars; that Henderson left this country, whereupon divers persons sued out attachments against him, and summoned the complainants as garnishees; that in these cases they were compelled to pay as garnishees for the said Henderson seventy-six dollars, in consequence of which they procured a credit…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ela v. American Merchants' Union Express Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API