Cox v. Alexander
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: E. D. Shattuck, Judge. Action on a promissory note, and from a judgment for plaintiff one defendant appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moore.
This is an action by Norris R. Cox against Robert Alexander, John Robertson, and G. W. Wallace, to recover *440on a promissory note alleged to have been executed by the defendants to one Thomas O’Day, and by the latter assigned to plaintiff. The answer, after denying the material allegations of the complaint, which is in the usual form, alleges that Robertson and Wallace entered into negotiations with G. Kutschan, S. Walker, and Dave Ogilvie for the purchase of 10,500 shares of mining stock, agreeing to pay therefor $3,150, to be evidenced by the defendants’…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Angle v. North-Western Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Estis v. TrabueSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Woodworth v. President, Directors, & Co. of the Bank of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1821
- Bradtfeldt v. CookeOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- McGrath v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Simpson v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Citizens Nat. Bank of Orange, Va. v. WaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Young v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Lassas v. McCartyOregon Supreme Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.