Davis Enterprises v. Karpf
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
POLLOCK, Justice.
This appeal presents the question whether a “hardship” variance sought pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(c) must be denied because an adjoining property owner offers to purchase the property at fair market value. Defendant, Planning Board of the Township of Cherry Hill (the Board), determined that the offer did not compel the denial of the variance and that the offer was one factor, among others, to be considered in determining whether to grant a variance to defendants Richard and Jack Karpf, who were purchasers under contract. The Law…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Harrington Glen, Inc. v. Municipal Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Chirichello v. ZONING BOARD, BOROUGH OF MONMOUTH BEACHSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Commons v. Westwood Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Kessler v. BowkerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Kaufmann v. Planning Bd. for Warren Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Bressman v. GashSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Jock v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Lang v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Commercial Realty & Resources Corp. v. First Atlantic Properties Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.