Legal Opinion

Davis Enterprises v. Karpf

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 31, 1987PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, Justice.

This appeal presents the question whether a “hardship” variance sought pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(c) must be denied because an adjoining property owner offers to purchase the property at fair market value. Defendant, Planning Board of the Township of Cherry Hill (the Board), determined that the offer did not compel the denial of the variance and that the offer was one factor, among others, to be considered in determining whether to grant a variance to defendants Richard and Jack Karpf, who were purchasers under contract. The Law…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Harrington Glen, Inc. v. Municipal Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  3. Chirichello v. ZONING BOARD, BOROUGH OF MONMOUTH BEACHSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Commons v. Westwood Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. Kessler v. BowkerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Kaufmann v. Planning Bd. for Warren Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Bressman v. GashSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Jock v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  4. Lang v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  5. Commercial Realty & Resources Corp. v. First Atlantic Properties Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API