Legal Opinion

H. Hackfeld & Co. v. Monsarrat

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal eeom Ciecuit Judge, Fibst Ciecuit.

1Opinion of the Court

*333OPINION OP THU! COURT BY

WILDER, J.

This is an appeal by defendant, the First National Bank of Hawaii at Honolulu, from a decree of mortgage foreclosure in the above entitled cause. The case was argued in this court on May 23, 1901, and was decided orally from the bench on the following day. The appellant contended that the trial judge erred in overruling its demurrer to plaintiff’s amended bill and in sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to its amended cross bill and that the final decree was erroneous in several particulars.

The first question is whether the demurrer to plaintiff’s amended bill was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BoyceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Hoag v. HatchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1855
  3. Crosby v. DowdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Strong v. PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Wooden v. HavilandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Powers v. EllisHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Powell v. PowellHawaii Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API