Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. McClanahan

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 2000No. 86953Published

1DissentJustice Freeman

In construing statutory provisions substantially similar to section 115 — 15 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (725 ILCS 5/115 — 15 (West 1998)), numerous state and federal courts have allowed the introduction of laboratory reports in evidence without requiring the testimony of the analysts who prepared the reports. I agree with these courts that the introduction of a laboratory report through a witness other than the analyst who prepared it does not violate a defendant’s right to be confronted with the witnesses against him. The laboratory report bears adequate indicia of reliability…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. InadiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API