Legal Opinion

Carroll v. City Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1933No. Docket No. 96, Calendar No. 37,336PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff has appealed by certiorari from an order and determination of the Grand Bapids city commission, acting as a civil service board, removing him from the office of superintendent of police. Appellant complains that the charges for which he was removed were not sustained by the testimony; that the action taken against him by the civil service board was arbitrary and captious; that members of the civil service board were prejudiced and disqualified; and that appellant was denied a fair and impartial hearing.

Appellant held his office under the civil service provisions of the Grand Bapids…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hart v. Common CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Martin v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Meridian v. DavidsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Carroll v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Public Welfare Commission v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Core v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Royal v. Ecorse Police & Fire CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API