Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. McMahan

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1937No. 6385Published

1Dissent

BUDGE, J.,

Dissenting. — It is useless and undesirable as a rule to express one’s dissenting views. However, in the instant ease, I feel bound to do so, limiting my views to that portion of the majority opinion overruling what has been the unquestioned, settled law in this jurisdiction since 1917. I will also call attention to the earlier decisions during territorial days and down to the case of State v. Lundhigh, 30 Ida. 365, 370, 164 Pac. 690. The majority' opinion not only overrules the settled law of this jurisdiction, but disregards the great weight of authority from other jurisdictions…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. State v. RoyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  2. People v. CroninCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. State v. McClurgIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. O'NeilIdaho Supreme Court · 1913

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API