Legal Opinion

Grunewald v. Jarvis

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 14, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1738PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs — five Washington, DC residents and an animal rights organization— have sued the National Park Service and Department of the Interior over a plan to reduce the deer population in Washington, DC’s Rock Creek Park that will likely involve shooting and killing deer either with guns or with bows and arrows. Plaintiffs claim that the government, in developing its plan, failed to comply with the laws establishing the Park itself and the Park Service, as well as the National Environmental Policy Act, and bring this action under the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carol Grunewald v. Jonathan JarvisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  2. Cape Hatteras Access Preservation Alliance v. S.M.R. JewellDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2014
  3. Duc X. Pham and Phoung K. Do Pham v. John Archer and Andrea Archer, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2025
  4. National Parks Conservation Association v. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API