Legal Opinion

McKnight v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 17, 1923Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

This case is very closely akin to the recent case of Mitchell v. Jimmerson, 160 Ark. 248, involving road districts created by special statutes identical in terms, except as to the territory and the roads to be improved. The district involved in the present controversy is Road District No. 16 of Woodruff County, which was created by act No. 183 of the General Assemblv at the extra session of 1920. The statute is, as before stated, identical in terms with act No. 209 of the same session, under which Road District No. 15 of Woodruff County was created, and which was involved in the case of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Easley v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Hill v. EcholsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Gibson v. SpikesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Commissioners of Broadway-Main Street Bridge District v. Quapaw ClubSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  5. Mitchell v. JimmersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API