Lake Beulah Management District v. State

¶ 68. {concurring). I join the majority opinion because its holding is the legally correct result. Given that our review "shall *89be confined to the record," Wis. Stat. § 227.57(1), I simply cannot dissent. Still, I write separately to express my uneasiness with the result in this case. Notwithstanding our decision today, there remains credible, concrete evidence that Well No. 7, now constructed and in operation since August 1, 2008, has the potential to harm the wetland and navigable surface waters of Lake Beulah. If the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) was not aware of this…