Legal Opinion
Neely v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1924No. Nos. 24,359, 24,360PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.
We have examined and compared the records and briefs of counsel filed in connection with the above entitled appeals, and have reached the conclusion that no good purpose will be subserved by writing an opinion in each case. Hence, for the purposes of an opinion, these cases are consolidated.
Appellants and one other person were jointly charged by indictment, tried at the same time, and convicted of unlawfully keeping a room used and occupied for gaming, in violation of §2466 Bunas 1914, Acts 1905 p. 584. Their separate motions for a new trial were overruled, aaad judgment followed in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Kemper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- People v. PerrinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- State v. NugentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Burrell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. ThomsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- Preston v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
- Stevens v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929