Legal Opinion

Franklin Chalfont Associates v. Kalikow

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1990No. 00605 and 00645PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*454CAVANAUGH, Judge:

This is an interlocutory appeal as of right, pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 311(a)(4), from an order entered March 1, 1989, as amended March 6, 1989, by the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, per Clark, J. Appellants Lawrence and Beverly Kalikow and Ronald and Sharon Prevatt are owners of homes which they purchased from Franklin Chalfont Associates, appellee herein, at Franklin’s Oxbow Ridge development in New Britain Township, Bucks County. The order of March 1, 1989 enjoined and restrained appellants and six other defendants no longer party to this action from picketing Oxbow…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Steven M. Kramer v. Richard ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. Kaplan v. Prolife Action League of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Constantakis, K. v. Bryan AdvisorySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Connor v. Clinton County PrisonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Ex Parte TucciTexas Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API