Legal Opinion

Aeon Realty Co. v. Arth

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 4, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

144 N.J. Super. 309 (1976)

365 A.2d 477

AEON REALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

THOMAS ARTH AND ELIZABETH ARTH, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted September 20, 1976.

Decided October 4, 1976.

Before Judges FRITZ, CRAHAY and ARD.

Mr. Joseph F. Rubacky, Jr., attorney for appellant.

There was no appearance on behalf of respondents.

2Per curiam

In this county district court tenancy action plaintiff landlord appeals from the dismissal of its complaint by the trial judge on his own motion. There was no hearing on the factual allegations pled…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marder v. Realty Construction Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  2. Marder v. Realty Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. Housing Authority, Newark v. WestSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  4. Charlie Collins Chevrolet v. ZebrowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. Den ex dem. Van Blarcom v. KipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1857

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Guttenberg Savings & Loan Ass'n v. RiveraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. J & M Land Co. v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. GUTTENBERG S. & L. ASS'N, CORP. v. RiveraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Parkway, Inc. v. Mabel Briggs CurryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API