Legal Opinion

Vroman v. Fish

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion by plaintiffs for a review and correction of the taxation and retaxation of costs.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

This is a motion by the plaintiffs for a review and correction of the taxation and retaxation of the costs as taxed and retaxed by the clerk of the county of Niagara in this action.

The action is in equity, and the plaintiffs succeeded at the trial. Upon appeal to the Appellate Division a judgment was rendered in these words: “ It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be, and the same hereby is, reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs.”

The county clerk has taxed and retaxed in favor of the successful defendants costs in both the trial and *303appellate courts, amounting in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schoonmaker v. BonnieNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Von Keller v. SchultingNew York Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Feltenstein v. ErnstAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Texas Co. (P. R.) v. Sancho BonetSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940
  2. Texas Co. v. Sancho BonetSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API