Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Kolczak

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 2004No. 03-432PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*521¶1 Glenn Kolczak sought a ruling from the District Court that he no longer had an obligation to provide health insurance or to pay medical bills for his ex-wife, Faye Kolczak, pursuant to their written Stipulation As to Medical Insurance. The District Court concluded that the issue is res judicata. We affirm the District Court.

¶2 The sole issue we address on appeal is whether the District Court erred in concluding that the 1994 determination that Glenn is obligated to provide medical insurance for Faye is res judicata.

BACKGROUND

¶3 The District Court dissolved Glenn and Faye’s marriage by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re the Marriage of KovashMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Wellman v. WellmanMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Mills v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Sheffield Insurance v. Lighthouse Properties, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of KolczakMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Marriage of CordeiroMontana Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API