Legal Opinion

Sanguine v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 23, 2005No. 3D04-1337PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.

Matthew Sanguine entered into a plea bargain wherein he pled nolo contendere to the charge of trafficking in cannabis, reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. The question is whether the consent to search by defendant-appellant Sanguine was validly obtained. We conclude that it was.

Officers from the Fort Lauderdale Police Department and the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) participated in a joint narcotics investigation. They obtained information that the defendant had placed illegal drugs in a warehouse in northern Miami-Dade…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. VargasSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. State v. SillsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moncrieffe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Rosenblatt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Rosenblatt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API