Legal Opinion
Blige v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided April 18, 1994No. S93G1420PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Benham, Presiding Justice.
On appeal from his convictions for burglary, aggravated assault and robbery, appellant contended that the trial court erred in permitting the State, in argument and in testimony, to identify a fingerprint expert who testified for the State as having been hired originally by appellant. The Court of Appeals affirmed Blige v. State, 208 Ga. App. 851 (3) (432 SE2d 574) (1993) (hereinafter, Blige III), holding that the issue had been decided adversely to appellant in a prior similar case involving him, Blige v. State, 205 Ga. App. 133 (6) (421 SE2d 547) (1992)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Sabel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- State v. BraddySupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Logan v. Chatham CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Blige v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rower v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Nance v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- McClain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Chrysler Grp. LLC v. WaldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.