Wells v. Fisher
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Davis, J.:
The action was originally brought to compel specific performance of an option to sell certain real property. The option was contained in a lease of the premises for a term of ten jrears made by defendant to plaintiff and executed October 3, 1914.
The language used was as follows: “ It is further agreed by and between the parties hereto that the party of the second part is to have the first privilege of purchasing said building and premises of the, party of the first part on the first day of October of any year during the term of this lease for the sum of twenty-three thousand dollars…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Ide v. LeiserMontana Supreme Court · 1890
- Schroeder v. GemeinderNevada Supreme Court · 1875
- Savage v. Salem Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Story v. . SalomonNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- R. I. Realty Co. v. TerrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Falkenstein v. PopperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Downey v. ShipstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Long v. SergioNew York Supreme Court · 1961