Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Condict

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 21, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On bill to foreclose.

1Opinion of the Court

Emery, V. C.

In this case the complainant forecloses a mortgage originally given upon about ninety-four acres of land, which was laid out in building lots (one thousand and forty-one in number), with parks, streets and depot lot. The defendant Mrs. Jennie Eeynolds is a subsequent mortgagee'of the “depot lot.” All of the lots and parks included in complainant’s mortgage have been released by complainant or her assignors, except the “ depot lot” and seventeen of the building lots. Nine hundred and eighty-one of the lots were released subsequent to the execution and recording of defendant’s…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dieckmann v. WalserNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  2. Scott v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Larkey v. Home Ins. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API