Legal Opinion
Zoss v. Protsch
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided April 10, 2023No. 4:20-cv-04211Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION FREDERICK M. ZOSS, Plaintiff 4:20-cv-4211 vs. ORDER GREG PROTSCH AND MUMFORD AND PROTSCH, LLP, Defendants Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, (Doc. 66), and an accompanying Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. (Doc. 68). Plaintiff resists the Motion. (Doc. 70). Defendants have replied. (Doc. 72). For the following reasons the Court grants the Defendants’ motion in part and denies it in part. BACKGROUND The Court has summarized the background to this case in several prior…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Yolanda Bediako v. Stein Mart, Inc. A Florida CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Agnes E. NILSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the CITY OF MOSS POINT, MISSISSIPPI, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Lachonne Bell v. Allstate Life Insurance Company Sears Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Agnes E. NILSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the CITY OF MOSS POINT, MISSISSIPPI, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2007