Legal Opinion
McClellan v. City of Sacramento
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 26, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00560Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PHAYJJON McCLELLAN, No. 2:20-cv-00560-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CITY OF SACRAMENTO; VINCENT 15 CATRICALA; DANIEL HAHN; DARBY LANNOM; and SACRAMENTO POLICE 16 DEPARTMENT, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants City of Sacramento, Vincent 22 Catricala (“Catricala”), Daniel Hahn, Darby Lannom (“Lannom”), and Sacramento Police 23 Department’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Strike. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff Phayjjon 24 McClellan (“Plaintiff”) filed an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Frank Howey v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. Radio Corporation of America, Third-Party v. Universal Services, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.