Legal Opinion
People v. Hoffstead
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 10, 2010PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Ordered that the order is affirmed.
Defendant was arrested for loitering for the purpose of begging (Penal Law § 240.35 [1]), and a search incident to the arrest yielded a pipe with a residue of a controlled substance. He was charged in a single information with both loitering for the purpose of begging and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (Penal Law § 220.03). He moved to suppress the evidence of the substance on the ground that there was no probable cause for his arrest. Following a suppression hearing, the City Court denied…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Devenpeck v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Village of StrattonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Jefferson v. RoseDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- People v. Eames (Melissa)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
- People v. MohamedAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
- People v. Mohamed (Mohamid)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016