Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Rocque

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1983No. 13363, 13432Published

1Concurrence

BISTLINE, Justice,

specially concurring.

At first blush this appeared to be a rather routine pro se1 appeal brought here by an inmate who reserved strong doubts that he should have been awarded two years in the penitentiary for a felony escape of which he did not believe himself guilty.

The brief of the Attorney General argues a State contention, one never advanced at *447trial, that where Rocque had been sentenced and placed on probation, that he was a “probationer.” From that premise, the soundness of which is not open to dispute, it is said that because “both the State Department of Corrections…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WageniusIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. LopezIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. MarksIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API