Legal Opinion
Ferrara v. United States
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 13, 2005No. CIV.00-11693-MLWPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CONCERNING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR A STAY
WOLF, District Judge.
I. SUMMARY
As described in the April 12, 2005 Memorandum and Order, petitioner Vincent Ferrara has proven that he was denied Due Process when the government violated its clearly established constitutional duty to disclose to Ferrara, before trial, important exculpatory information that directly negated his guilt on charges that Ferrara had ordered his codefendant Pasquale Barone to murder Vincent James Limoli. See Ferrara v. United States, 2005 WL 903196 (D.Mass. Apr. 12, 2005). This Memorandum should be read in…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Reid v. DonelanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Goldman v. WinnDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Aurora Isidro-Calixtro v. Ernesto Santa Cruz, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Brito v. BarrDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Frank Higiro v. Michael Nessinger; David Wesling; Todd M. Lyons; Kristi Noem; and Pamela J. BondiDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.