Legal Opinion
In re Surinam Airways Holding Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 23, 1992No. 92-4456PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAY, Circuit Judge:
This case comes before the court on a joint petition for a writ of mandamus. The petitioners are the defendants and third-party defendant in two consolidated wrongful death actions. They claim that this court should issue a writ of mandamus because the district court erroneously concluded that it had discretion to remand the plaintiffs’ claims to state court despite its acknowledged jurisdiction over both the plaintiffs’ claims and the third-party claims asserted in the consolidated actions. In an alternative attempt to obtain relief from the district court's partial remand…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ramiro Arango and Gabriella Arango, Individually, Etc., Plaintiffs v. Guzman Travel Advisors Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Katie Lowery v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Davis v. McCourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Snapper, Inc. v. RedanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Trans Penn Wax Corporation v. Michael MccandlessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- New v. Sports & Recreation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.