Eisenhardt v. Snook
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Per curiam
| jAt issue in this case is whether the court of appeal erred in reversing the district court’s judgment in part and assessing fault to defendants. For the reasons that follow, we find the court of appeal erred in disturbing the district court’s judgment, and therefore reinstate the district court’s judgment in its entirety.
UNDERLYING FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This litigation arises from a slip and fall incident which occurred at the home of Dories Snook. On the day of the incident, Ms. Snook was doing some work inside the home, while her live-in boyfriend, Don Ei-senhardt, was working…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Socorro v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Hutchinson v. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, NO. 5747Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Broussard v. State ex rel. Office of State BuildingsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
- Pryor v. Iberia Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Caserta v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- Hooper v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Beggs v. Harrah's New Orleans CasinoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.