Legal Opinion

Love v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 20, 1907No. 3893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Bell. John M. Eurman. Tried below before the Hon. Appeal from a conviction of burglary; ment in the penitentiary. penalty, two years imprison- The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, the charge being that he did at night by force, threats and fraud break and enter a house occupied by O. F. Allen.

The evidence, as we understand the facts, does not support the allegation contained in the indictment. The State’s case is that appellant should have entered a telephone booth situated in the Sante Fe depot building and committed theft of some money from a drawer connected with the telephone booth. This booth was open to the public indiscriminately, and was so arranged that parties who desired to talk over the phone…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hulbert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Conner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Connor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API