Bell Helicopter International, Inc. v. Jacobs
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Bell Helicopter International, Inc. (Bell Helicopter) petitions for review of the decision and order of the Benefits Review Board (the Board) affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (AU) award of benefits to the claimant under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act1 (the Act). Bell Helicopter contends that the AU relied on inadmissible hearsay in reaching his conclusions, and that the claimant did not present substantial evidence to support a finding that the injury arose out of and in the course of employment. We reject this contention and affirm.
I.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mary R. Wheatley v. Herman Adler, Deputy Commissioner, United States Department of Labor Bureau of Employees' CompensationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Ramon P. Johnson v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- U. S. Industries/Federal Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Swinton v. J. Frank Kelly, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Watker v. Vermont Parole BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Bell Helicopter International, Incorporated v. William C. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Watker v. Vermont Parole BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991