Conroy v. Burda

Koch, J.,

We have before us the disposition of a petition for the allowance of an appeal nunc pro tunc from the judgment of an alderman. A rule was granted, an answer filed and dispositions taken. Security in the sum of $250 was entered.

It appears that John E. Conroy, trading as Conroy’s, instituted an action in assumpsit against petitioners seeking to recover $121.97. Petitioners appeared for a hearing before the alderman, Richard. J. Snyder, on July 6, 1954. Because of the failure of plaintiff to appear, the alderman continued the matter. At a subsequent hearing, defendants (petitioners)…