Legal Opinion

Ledford v. Peeples

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 22, 2009No. 06-10715PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:

In this case, two parties, X and Y, each owned a fifty percent interest in a limited liability company that manufactured and sold carpets. X provided the financing; Y ran the company and marketed its product. The parties had a buy-sell agreement that enabled either party to buy out the other at any time by offering to purchase the other’s interest in the company at a set price. After receiving an offer, the offeree would have thirty days in which to accept the offer or elect to purchase the offeror’s interest at the same set price.

Y offered to purchase X’s interest for…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. LeFrere v. QuezadaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Bush v. Bank of New York MellonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Ledford v. PeeplesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  4. In re Healthsouth Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2009
  5. Krecht v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API