In Re Coles
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:
The issue at bench is whether we should permit the consolidation of the above two cases. We conclude that these cases may be more properly handled through joint administration rather than through consolidation.
The facts, as set forth in the affidavit of the debtors in support of their motion to consolidate, are as follows: The two debtors, although not married, have lived together for the past three years. Consequently, they have incurred joint debts and have obtained joint assets. Because the debtors are not spouses, they are precluded…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sampsell v. Imperial Paper & Color Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Chemical Bank New York Trust Co. v. KheelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Flora Mir Candy Corporation v. DicksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of SteuryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
- Matter of StuartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1983
- In Re KnobelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1994
- In Re BirchUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1987
- In Re MaloneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.