Legal Opinion

Pio v. Adcco, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1974PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Consolidated in this opinion are two appeals by plaintiff Pio from adverse judgments by separate courts in separate actions to foreclose liens on real property under ORS 87.855 et seq. The result in each ease turns on the construction placed on ORS 87.855 (1), which provides:

“(1) Every employer who is required to pay contributions, by agreement or otherwise, into a fund of any employe benefit plan in order that his employe may participate therein, shall pay such contributions in the required amounts and at the stipulated time or each employe affected thereby shall have a lien on the earnings…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. PETERS v. McKAYOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Mathis v. Thunderbird Village, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Estate of Terney v. BeltonOregon Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. James v. Carnation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Thompson v. IDS Life Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Spaght v. State ex rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Hammagren v. Wald Construction, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. JaloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API