Legal Opinion
DDDJ, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Commission
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 30, 1990No. 90AP-48PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCormac, Judge.
Appellant, DDDJ, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas affirming the order of appellee, Liquor Control Commission, suspending appellant’s liquor permit for two days and raises the following assignments of error:
“I. The court of common pleas erred in finding that the commission’s decision was in accordance with law.
“II. The court of common pleas erred in rejecting appellant’s contention that rule 4301:1-1-50 is void for vagueness and a violation of the due process of law.”
The February 22, 1989 hearing before the commission proceeded on a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carroll v. Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Burger Brewing Co. v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Salem v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. FryeOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Midwestern College of Massotherapy v. Ohio Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Fehrman v. Ohio Department of CommerceOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hi Rise, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Burneson v. Ohio State Racing Commission, 08ap-794 (3-12-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.