Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1991)

Missouri Attorney General Reports

Decided November 26, 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Jay Nixon Senator, District 22 State Capitol Building, Room 429 Jefferson City, Missouri 65101

Dear Senator Nixon:

This opinion is in response to your question asking:

Do the provisions of section 321.017, RSMo Supp. 1991 (section 11 of 1991 Truly Agreed To CCS/HCS/SCS/SB 262) require that members of fire protection district boards and ambulance district boards holding office on August 28, 1991, who are employed by a fire protection district or ambulance district, resign as of such date, or may such members serve the remainder of their terms? If required to resign, what is the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wolff Shoe Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  2. Lincoln Credit Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. Hastings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Nicolai v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Rental Storage & Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API