Legal Opinion

Joanne C. Stahl v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 17, 1996No. 95-3778PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Joanne Stahl seeks review of the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, SE0752950274-I-1, dismissing her appeal as untimely filed. We affirm the dismissal.

BACKGROUND

Ms. Stahl, a Distribution Clerk with the Postal Service, was removed from service in March 1992 on the ground that she was medically unfit for duty. Ms. Stahl is a preference eligible veteran as defined by statute, and therefore is afforded certain appeal rights not available to other Postal employees. 5 U.S.C. § 2108; 39 U.S.C. § 1005. Upon her removal the Postal Service gave Ms. Stahl the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Joseph F. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. G.K. Phillips v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  3. 55 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1675, 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,952 Julio M. Cruz v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  4. Krim M. Ballentine v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Tyler Hopkins, Jr. v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maddox v. RunyonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. Ruben Martinez v. Rodney E. Slater, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  3. Maddox v. RunyonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. Winns v. DeJoyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API