Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Alvarez-Gutierrez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 14, 2005No. 04-10241PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
The defendant-appellant Daniel Alvarez-Gutierrez pleaded guilty to illegal entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (2003). In imposing sentence, the district court enhanced Alvarez-Gutierrez’s base offense level by eight levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) (2003), which provides for such an increase when a defendant was previously deported after conviction of an “aggravated felony.”
Alvarez-Gutierrez had been previously deported after conviction of statutory sexual seduction, a gross misdemeanor under Nevada state law. The district court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Webster v. Reproductive Health ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Rafael Baron-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard J. SMITH, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rahmatullah Afridi v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Jose Roberto Fernandez-Ruiz v. Alberto R. Gonzales , Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Roberto Ortega-Mendez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Maya-Cruz v. KeislerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Afridi v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.