State v. Greer
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUCKER, Judge.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in allowing the prosecutor to use the testimony of a witness as recorded at the preliminary hearing. Appellant concedes that such matter is committed to the trial court’s discretion, State v. Pereda, 111 Ariz. 344, 529 P.2d 695 (1974), but contends that discretion was abused for the reason that the State did not make the requisite showing of a good faith effort to locate the witness.
A preliminary hearing was held on September 16, 1974, at which two witnesses for the State testified — Edward Garrett and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berger v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. BeyeaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. PayneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- State v. OwensArizona Supreme Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. EdwardsArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- State v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978