Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 2010No. 116 SSM 5PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, defendant City of New York’s motion for summary judgment granted, the complaint and all cross claims against the City of New York dismissed, and certified question answered in the negative. No triable issue of fact exists as to whether the City created a dangerous condition that caused plaintiffs injuries.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Grapfeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Washington v. WashingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 2010

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Early v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Tucker v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Gary v. 101 Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Vidakovic v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Rodriguez v. Themelion Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API