Legal Opinion

Ex parte Sampson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 7, 1984No. 69226Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

W.C. DAVIS, Judge.

This is an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Art. 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. Applicant was convicted of forgery. He now contends his indictment was fundamentally defective for failure to allege that the purported maker of the forged instrument did not authorize applicant’s act.

Applicant relies upon cases which arose under the present penal code, but the instant case arises under the former penal code, Art. 996, which denounced forgery by passing.

Forgery cases which arise under V.A. T.S., Penal Code, Sec. 32.21 require an allegation that the purported maker did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Landry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API