Legal Opinion
Deegan v. City of Ithaca
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 6, 2006No. Docket No. 04-4708 CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Kevin Deegan commenced this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 & 1988, seeking damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief against the City of Ithaca, New York, the City Attorney Marriette Geldenhuys, and the Chief of Police Richard Basile (collectively, “Defendants”). Deegan alleged that his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when he was prevented, under the purported authority of municipal noise ordinances, from preaching in Ithaca Commons. Following discovery, the District Court entertained cross motions for summary…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Marcavage v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Costello v. City of BurlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of PomonaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- United States v. American Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Deegan v. City of IthacaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.