Legal Opinion

Lough v. Robinson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1996No. 95CA18PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Kline, Judge.

This appeal arises from an order of the Washington County Municipal Court garnishing defendant-appellant Marvin Robinson’s wages in the amount of $87.21 as payment on a judgment owed to plaintiffs-appellees John and Kathy Lough. The trial court found that appellant’s biweekly disposable earnings were $348.86. 1 Appellant was also subject to a support order deduction from his biweekly wages in the amount of $131.34. Appellant claims that the order garnishing his wages violates the Consumer Credit Protection Act, Section 1671 et seq., Title 15, U.S.Code.

In addition to the federal…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hodgson v. Cleveland Municipal CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1971
  2. Long Island Trust Company v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. Marshall v. Dist. Ct. for Forty-First-B Jud. Dist.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
  4. First National Bank v. HastyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
  5. Nurse v. PortisOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re RummelOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API