Legal Opinion · Dissent

Creole Explorations, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1963No. 535Published

1Dissent

A. WILMOT DALFERES, Judge ad hoc

(dissenting).

Plaintiff entered into a contract of insurance with defendants to protect itself against certain unusual expenses incurred as a result of the hazards of its business. Specifically, the policy provided that plaintiff should recover expenses incurred in regaining control of an oil and gas well which it was in the process of drilling, when such expenses were resulting from: “Blowout and/or Cratering.”

*389The Court observes that the term “blowout,” the pertinent provision in the instant case, is referred to in the same category as fire —…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Albritton v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  2. Green v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Watkins v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  4. Keener v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Central Manufacturers' Mut. Ins. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API