Legal Opinion

Harold Nance v. Walter C. Kelly, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 28, 1990No. 997, Docket 89-2310PublishedCited by 296 opinions

1Per curiam

Harold Nance, pro se, appeals a June 19, 1989, judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, John T. Curtin, Judge, dismissing his complaint sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). Nance’s complaint seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982) against Walter Kelly, the Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, in connection with alleged constitutional violations during Nance’s imprisonment at Attica. We reverse and remand.

Nance filed his complaint in forma pau-peris. His complaint consisted of handwritten responses to a printed “Form to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Wilson v. RackmillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

3Cited by296 opinions

  1. Richard A. LIVINGSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADIRONDACK BEVERAGE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Chance v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Chance v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Hathaway v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Hathaway v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

291 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API