Legal Opinion
Public Service Ry. Co. v. Moffett
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 25, 1915No. 485PublishedCited by 3 opinions
At Law. Action by the Public Service Railway Company' and another against Isaac Moffett.
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, Circuit Judge.
[1] This is ailother of the cases associated with No. 481, Public Service Railway Company & Rapid Transit Street Railway Company, Plaintiffs, v. Herold, Defendant (D. C.) 219 Fed. 301. It involves taxes paid for 1909, 1910, 1911 and 1912. Following the ruling in case 481, the defendant’s plea of the statute of limitations with respect to the taxes for 1909 and 1910 must be sustained.
[2] Whether or not the Camden Horse Railroad Company was doing business during the years 1911 and 1912 is necessarily ■ involved. It appears that the property of the Camden Horse Railroad…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCoach v. Minehill & Schuylkill Haven RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Public Service Ry. Co. v. HeroldDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- Public Service Ry. Co. v. HeroldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- Public Service Electric Co. v. HeroldDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
- Public Service Ry. Co. v. HeroldDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1915