Legal Opinion
State v. Bradley
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 22, 1986No. 52130-1PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
Joseph and Elizabeth Bradley appeal their convictions for the possession of cocaine. The Bradleys' central challenge is that the State cannot convict individuals on the basis of evidence that federal officials seized in violation of the state constitution. We do not agree with the Bradleys that Const, art. 1, § 7 requires exclusion of evidence seized by federal officials in a border search. We reject their other challenges and affirm the trial court's judgments.
The parties do not dispute the facts. On October 1, 1983, Joseph and Elizabeth Bradley were passengers in a car that stopped at the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. ReichenbachWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ReichenbachWashington Supreme Court · 2004
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.