Legal Opinion · Dissent

Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. Metabolite Laboratories, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 11, 2010No. 2008-1597Published

1DissentDyk, Circuit Judge

At its heart, this case involves the question whether the res judicata effect of our *1287earlier decision in Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. v. Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings, 370 F.3d 1354 (Fed.Cir.2004) (“Metabolite II ”), requires that the contract provision here be treated as terminated. The majority finds that we lack jurisdiction over that question and transfers to the 10th Circuit, so that the 10th Circuit must determine the res judicata effect of our prior judgment. In my view, jurisdiction over this case lies in this court for at least two reasons. First, we have jurisdiction because…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API